Author: Anna Lipniacka
NORNDIP, the Annual Conference of the Nordic Network for Diversity in
Physics, took place at the University of Bergen, Norway, in May 2024.
See: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1384666/overview
These
conferences typically have a balanced mixture of invited physics talks
and gender talks. Gender talks cover gender-balance reports from Nordic
Countries. Each conference has a special leading theme, in 2024 the
theme was "Microaggression", the leading theme of the 2025 conference
will be "Diverse trajectories - Challenging the norms in physics
research and culture”.
Below, a short report from the leading
themes of gender-talks. Adrienne Taxler reported on quantitative studies
of barriers to diversity in physics in academia, quoting sexual
harassment, hostile climate, microaggressions as often quoted problems.
Randi Gressgård reported on her studies of microaggressions in academic
institutions, noting that people of color and women are often subtly
marked as intruders even by persons with good intentions.
According
to studies, women and minority people are assumed to be inferior or
more junior in rank than they actually are, through little encounters
signalling lack of competence, skill or intelligence. Every female
professor I know was asked at least once "Are you a student here?"
during her professorship career, and not because of her young looks. It
is because only ‘When you look like what they expect a professor to be,
you are treated like a professor’. Siri Øyslebø Sørensen and Eva
Amundsdotter reported on the project GenderAct, an institutional project
running at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of the
University of Bergen, Norway.
The gender (in) balance at the
Faculty is stable for the last 20 years. The project had as a first part
a task to understand the complicated causes of gender imbalance in this
specific environment, then mobilize for change and transform patterns
as the last step. During this process it was learned that resistance
towards the topic of gender as such is common in academic institutions.
This resistance takes forms of gender hostility - discomfort associated
with becoming aware/ conscious and gender blindness - strong belief in
meritocracy as neutral. There is a resistance to change and transform
gendered patterns that takes forms of undermining, distracting
attention, pretending, sabotage, avoidance, disclaiming. The
practical forms of resistance observed for this particular project in
interaction with leaders of the departments were: no open reactions,
just ‘whispering in the hallways’, action plan is approved, but not
followed up on, open critique in plenary meeting.
The next phase
of the GenderAct project will study the resistance to change, and how to
deal with it. The most optimistic report was by Maria Saline, a
coordinator of Gender Initiative for Excellence, GENIE at Chalmers
University in Gothenburg, Sweden. The project seems to be on a good way
to reverse barriers to female faculty hiring and retention by investing
in excellent hires.