|
|
Posted By Administration,
Tuesday 10 November 2020
|
Author: Sara Pirrone
The Equal Opportunity Committee of the Italian Physical Society
(SIF), whose members are Anna Di Ciaccio, Maria Rosaria Masullo, Sara
Pirrone (Chair), Massimiliano Rinaldi, Paolo Rossi, Silvia Soria,
carried out two activities on the occasion of the annual National
Congress of the Society that, due to the pandemic, has been held this
year via online streaming from 14 to 18 September.
The two activities were titled “The Women Scientist of the Sections” and “The modified time during the COVID19 period”.
In
“The Women Scientist of the Sections” activity, related to the problem
of the gender equality in physics, each traditional scientific section
of the Congress (see also at https://www.primapagina.sif.it/issue/82) has been represented by a woman scientist, specifically selected in the field of physics of that section.
For this year we have chosen Lisa Meitner (Vienna 1878–Cambridge 1968) to represent the section “Nuclear and Subnuclear Physics”, Rita Brunetti (Milano 1890–Pavia 1942) for“Solid State Physics”, Vera Rubin (Philadelphia 1928–Princeton 2016) for “Astrophysics”, Giuseppina Aliverti (Somma Lombardo 1894–Napoli 1982) for “Geophysics and Physics of the Environment”, Daria Bocciarelli (Parma 1910–Roma 2006) for “Biophysics and Medical Physics”, Hedy Lamarr (Vienna 1914–Altomonte Springs Florida 2000) for “Applied Physics, Accelerators and Physics applied to Cultural Heritage” and Laura Bassi (Bologna 1711–Bologna 1778) for “Physics Education and History of Physics”.
This
activity can be considered in the framework of the so-called “mentoring
action”, that helps to create a “leading figure”, which is so important
especially for young people when the future choices have to be made. We
proposed some examples of women who have excelled in a field of
physics, and that can be a model to emulate for the new generations. We
selected in particular women scientist of the past that had great
difficulties to come out on top, just for a gender question, that is for
the sole reason that they were women. Beautiful revisited pictures and
biographic cards were prepared, which you can see at https://www.sif.it/attivita/cpo/scienziate-2020-cpo
In
the activity “The modified time during the COVID19 period”, related to
the study of gender difference in particular social situations, we have
realized short interviews to male and female, junior and senior, staff
and temporary researchers in physics. The subject concerned how the
lockdown period during the pandemic modified the time and the way to
live in connection with one’s own scientific activity. The aim was to
highlight gender differences or inequalities, and if any, to search for
the reasons, the motivations, the stereotypes and the social
conditioning for this. You can see the videos of the interviews at https://www.sif.it/attivita/cpo/interviste-2020-cpo
Tags:
congress
Equal Opportunities Committee
Italian Phyical Society
SIF
women in physics
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By admin,
Monday 27 January 2020
Updated: Monday 27 January 2020
|
author: Luc Bergé
In late 2019, Cristiane Morais Smith from the Institute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University in the Netherlands, was awarded the Winter 2019 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction.
Luc Bergé [LB], chair of the EPS Equal Opportunities Committee, interviewed her [CMS].
|
LB: At what point in your education did you consider a career in physics?
CMS: I did my studies in Paraguacu Paulista, a little village in Brazil, where I was born. When I was 13 years old, the Science teacher gave us a problem to solve: Calculate the acceleration of a particle sliding down an inclined plane without friction. This is the celebrated problem of Galileo, the fact that the acceleration does not depend on the mass. The teacher did not expect that any of us would be able to do it, he considered it as a game. I solved the problem, and when he realized that I had done it, he started shouting for joy. He was a very serious and shy person, and we were all astonished by his expression of genuine enthusiasm. I then asked him: if I would like to play this kind of games when I am older, which profession should I have? He answered: Physicist! That was it! I was decided to become a physicist, although I had never seen one before.
|

FIG. 1: Prof. C. Morais Smith, Utrecht University, Netherlands (copyright: Ivar Pel)
|
LB: Did you find a resistance to girls succeeding in science?
CMS: The first resistance came from my own family. In Brazil, there is no exam to finish the school, like the Baccalaureate degree, but there is an exam to enter the university. It is extremely difficult: 4 hours of exam per day during 5 days, and usually there are 100 candidates for each available place. The best universities are the public ones, which are free, but you can usually access one of those only if you study in good private schools, which are very expensive. There were no private schools in my little village. I knew that I should go to a neighbouring town named Marilia to study, otherwise I would have no chance to access a really good university, but this was expensive. One year before my entrance exam to the University, my parents decided to send my youngest brother to a private school in this town. He had still 3 years to go before his exam, but I had only one. If they had money for one kid, I should logically get priority because my exam was closer. But my father argued: your brother will be a family head, so he should have priority to enter the university. I contested and finally my parents sent me too. I studied 16 hours a day to catch up all what I should have learned during the previous years and succeeded to go to UNICAMP, one of the best universities in Brazil. Despite this incident, I must say that I come from a family of very strong women: one of my grand-Moms (102 years old by now) was the first woman to work as a public employee in my village, my mom worked and studied all her life, despite her 4 kids… but boys had a preference in case of scarce funds.
LB: Do you believe that physics should positively discriminate in favour of women?
CMS: I did not think so when I was young and naïve. I wanted to get everything on my own, and I would have been offended to get anything based on quotas… but now that I have enough experience, I am very much in favour of positive discrimination. We are all constantly discriminating against women, even if we do not wish or even if we are not aware of it. One has to compensate for that somehow, at least until we reach a higher percentage of female physicists. Very often I am the only female speaker in a conference, and this is not normal.
LB: Do you have advices to girls that wish to start a career in physics?
CMS: Yes. It is fascinating to do physics and to understand how the world around us works. I cannot imagine a better career and a more interesting job. You will be in contact with young students and will discuss with colleagues from all nationalities. You will travel the world and discover that people think and do things differently in other countries. This is an international profession, you can easily be a physicist in any country in the world. And if you decide to change your life and quit the academic career, you can always find a job in industry because physicists learn how to solve problems in general, and people love to have them in their companies!
FIG. 2: Prof. C. Morais Smith at a PhD ceremony of one of her students in front of a wall of the Academy building
covered with the portrait of female professors at Utrecht University, for a campaign launched during the 100 year Jubilee
of the first woman professor.
Tags:
Emmy Noether Distinction
Equal Opportunities Committee
Theoretical Physics
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday 19 May 2016
Updated: Thursday 19 May 2016
|
In 2013, the European Physical Society [EPS] launched the Emmy Noether Distinction to recognize noteworthy women physicists.
Emmy Noether was an influential theoretical physicist, and a role model for future generations of physicists. The laureates of the Emmy Noether Distinction are chosen for their capacity to inspire the next generation of scientists, and especially encourage women to handle careers in physics.
The previous prizes were awarded to:
- Prof. Sibylle Günter, IPP, Germany (2015)
- Prof. Anna Fontcuberta i Morral, EPFL Lausanne, Switzerland (2015)
- Prof. Anne L’Huillier, Faculty of Engineering, LTH in Lund, Sweden (2014)
- Dr. Alessandra Gatti, Institute of Photonics and Nanotechnologies [IFN-CNR], Como, Italy (2014)
- Prof. Nynke Dekker, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands (2013)
- Dr. Rumiana Dimova, MPI Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany (2013)
The EPS Emmy Noether Distinction for Women in Physics is awarded twice a year. The selection committee, appointed by the EPS Equal Opportunities Committee, will consider nominations for female scientists working in Europe.
To make a nomination, please email the following information to the EPS Secretariat:
- A cover letter, detailing (in no more than 3 paragraphs) the motivation for awarding the Emmy Noether distinction to the nominee;
- The nominee’s name, institution and email;
- The nominee’s résumé;
- The nominator’s name, institution, and email.
Download the distinction charter.
Read more about the Emmy Noether distinction on the EPS website.
Tags:
call
distinction
Emmy Noether DIstinction
EOC
Equal Opportunities Committee
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday 10 March 2014
|
You can read the newsletter of the European Platform of Women Scientists by following this link.
Tags:
EPWS
Equal Opportunities Committee
newsletter
Permalink
|
|
|
|