|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday 13 February 2025
|

Gražina Tautvaišienė - image credit: Gražina Tautvaišienė
In 2024, the European Physical Society released a calendar of inspiring physicists.
Gina Gunaratnam, EPS communication coordinator and initator of the
project, interviewed Gražina Tautvaišienė, president of the Lithuanian
Physical Society. Professor Tautvaišienė works as an astrophysicist at
the Vilnius University (VU) and is also vice-president of the
International Union of Astronomy since December 2024.
How did you get to know the European Physical Society?
The
European Physical Society is a well-known organisation for all
physicists. It cooperates with national physical societies to promote
physics, to support physicists worldwide, and to foster international
collaboration. My first encounter with EPS activities probably occurred
in 2000 when the EGAS 32 conference was organised at our Institute of
Theoretical Physics and Astronomy in Lithuania. I started to follow EPS
activities more closely when I became a vice-president of the
Lithuanian Physical Society in 2007.
Why is it important for you to be an EPS member and to participate in its activities?
International
collaboration is very important for such a small country as Lithuania.
EPS has divisions covering all main fields of physics. As EPS unites
scientists from 42 National Physical Societies, it is an essential
platform for developing international collaboration. Lithuanian
scientists often need collaboration to access large international
infrastructures like CERN, ESO, ITER, etc. Collaboration is also
important in order to prepare large groundbreaking research projects,
networking, and mobility.
We are very glad that quite many international conferences of EPS have been organised in Lithuania. We had the 14th
European Conference on Atoms, Molecules, and Photons (ECAMP) in 2022.
This conference brought together atomic, molecular, and optical physics
experts to discuss recent developments and research in the field. In
2024, we held the 11th EPS-QEOD Conference “Europhoton”,
where the latest developments in solid-state physics, optical cables and
waveguides were presented. In 2025, we will host the 51st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics.
An
outstanding example of a close relationship with EPS was the
inauguration of the Grotthuss Laboratory as the EPS Historic Site in
Žeimelis, Lithuania. This is the first EPS Historic Site in the Baltic
states.
What is the aim of the Lithuanian Physical Society and its main activities?
The
Lithuanian Physical Society was established in 1963. The main goal of
our society is to unite Lithuanian physicists, coordinate and support
their activities in order to contribute to the development of physics
research in Lithuania and take care of physics teaching in universities
and other educational institutions. We organise the National Conferences
on Physics every two years, which attract about 600 participants. Every
year, we support the physics olympiad and summer school “Fotonas” of
schoolchildren. We organise annual public events dedicated to e.g.
Quantum Day and European Researchers Night. Various recent events marked
the UNESCO International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable
Development. Now we prepare for the UNESCO International Year of Quantum
Science and Technology.
Why did you study physics and become an astrophysicist?
I
liked sciences that required logical thinking. Physics is exactly like
that. However, physics is a very broad science, and I had to decide
which field to turn to. And here, the decisive role was played by the
meeting of the Lithuanian Astronomical Union at the Molėtai Astronomical
Observatory, which I attended after finishing the 10th grade. There, I
won a place on the Lithuanian team for the meeting of young astronomers
of the Soviet Union. Then my path to astronomy began. All summer, I
studied astronomy at the Kaunas Public Library, studied constellations,
and read various books. By the way, being a schoolchild, I really liked
reading books, especially about scientists, politicians, and artists and
how they lived and worked. The story of Marie Curie was very memorable.
She was an inspiring role model for me.
Could you describe your current field of research?
Currently,
together with my colleagues, I am working on improving methods for
determining the age of stars. Knowing the age of stars is very important
in many aspects. It is very important to know it in order to clarify
the evolution of our and other galaxies, the evolution of stars, the
characterization of exoplanets, etc. The period for such investigations
is very favorable because NASA's TESS telescope is now orbiting in space
and is providing important asteroseismic information for determining
the stellar age. If robust seismic pulsations could be detected in all
stars, there would be no problems in stellar age determinations.
However, it is not possible to reliably record the pulsations of many
stars, and other methods must be sought. Among these are the so-called
chemical clocks - the abundance ratios of various chemical elements. The
Science Council of Lithuania is funding our research “Chemical elements
as clocks for determining the age of stars”. We are analysing the use
of the abundance ratios of carbon and nitrogen and yttrium and magnesium
chemical elements in order to determine the age of stars. Several other
projects also are on the way, including the one on the investigation of
planet-hosting stars.
What are the challenges of your field?
There
are many challenges. As Lithuanian folk experience says - the deeper
into the forest, the more trees... Much is expected in the field of
exoplanet search and research. This is a relatively new field of
research. Incredible planets are being discovered around other stars
which are not found in our solar system. The question arises of how
planets form and what their characteristics depend on. Several space
telescopes have been launched into space and are planned for exoplanet
research. As Vice President of the International Astronomical Union, I
am entrusted with the coordination of space and ground-based research.
Here, my experience in coordinating the Europlanet telescope network,
which currently unites 17 observatories with medium-sized and small
telescopes, will come in handy. Ground-based observations for space
missions require a lot of time, and smaller telescopes are very suitable
for this. I plan to significantly expand the Europlanet telescope
network, which also includes the Molėtai Astronomical Observatory in
Lithuania.
How would you encourage students to work in this field?
Lithuania,
as a country with strong traditions in astronomy, opens up very wide
opportunities for research and international cooperation. The first
observatory in Lithuania was established back in 1753. The Vilnius
University Astronomical Observatory is one of the oldest in Europe. At
that time it had over 100 different instruments. Currently, the VU
Molėtai Astronomical Observatory is also no less known. It operates the
largest telescope in Northern Europe with modern instruments, and is
recognized as a place for organising international schools for young
astronomers.
International collaboration opens possibilities to
accomplish indeed a very high level of research. E.g., the research team
I am leading participated in the Gaia-ESO Public Survey, uniting more
than 300 researchers. We obtained more than 300 observing nights on the
8,2-metre telescope of the European Southern Observatory (ESO).
Presently, we participate in several other large spectroscopic survey
projects (4MOST on the 4.1-metre ESO VISTA telescope and WEAVE on the
4.2-m William Herschel Telescope in the Canary Islands).
Education
in physics and astrophysics also opens many other opportunities for a
future professional career. Lithuania is nurturing an innovative
ecosystem, particularly in deep-tech and quantum computing, giving
physics graduates opportunities to be part of groundbreaking projects
including space research. The Research Council of Lithuania is
organising enjoyable student training visits to NASA science centers in
the United States.
Do you think it is important to encourage girls to study physics? What would you tell them?
I
think that girls have been underrepresented in physics due to societal
biases. More and more amazing women are thriving in physics today. It is
important to show them as role models to girls. The EPS calendar of
inspiring female physicists is playing this role perfectly.
Tags:
astrophysics
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
IAU
Internationla Astronomy Union
outreach
women in physics
women in science
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday 17 January 2025
Updated: Friday 17 January 2025
|

The European Physical Society launched the Emmy Noether Distinction
to recognize noteworthy female physicists who have a strong connection to
Europe through their nationality or work.
Emmy Noether, with her
fundamental and revolutionary work in the abstract algebra and on
conservation laws in theoretical physics, is an exceptional historical
figure for all generations - past, present and future - of physicists.
The
laureates of the Emmy Noether Distinction are chosen for their capacity
to inspire the next generation of scientists, and especially encourage
women to pursue a career in physics. Attribution criteria therefore
focus on the candidate’s:
• research achievements
• endeavours to promote gender equality and the empowerment of women in physics
• coordination of projects and management activity
• service to the scientific community and research administration
Nominators are encouraged to address these four points in their proposal.
Commencing
2022, the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction for Women in Physics is to be
awarded once a year, to two distinguished women in physics. Namely,
the Emmy Noether Distinction will be awarded to an early- and mid–career
laureate, as well as to a more advanced candidate, as a Distinction for
her full career.
|
The selection committee, appointed by the EPS
Equal Opportunities Committee, will consider nominations of women
in physics working in Europe for the 2024 Edition of the Emmy Noether Distinction as of the nomination deadline of 31st March 2025.
|
To make a nomination, apply via this site or submit the following documents to the EPS Secretariat:
-
A cover letter, detailing (in no more than 3 paragraphs) the motivation for awarding the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction to the nominee and providing the proposed citation (for.... or in recognition of.... One sentence, <30 words);
-
The nominee’s name, institution and email
-
The nominee’s CV
-
The nominator’s name, institution, and email
-
Optional: No more than 3 support letters
Download the distinction charter
Read more about the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction on the EPS website
Tags:
EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
gender equality
women in physics
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday 12 December 2024
Updated: Thursday 12 December 2024
|
The European Physical Society (EPS) is delighted to announce that the 2023 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction has been awarded to Lavinia Heisenberg and Gloria Platero. Congratulations!
2023 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction - Mid-career

The EPS has decided to award the 2023 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction (mid-career) to Lavinia Heisenberg, professor at the Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Germany "for
her fundamental contributions to gravitational physics and theoretical
cosmology, for her engagement for women in science and her outstanding
leadership".
Prof. Lavinia Heisenberg has achieved groundbreaking advancements in
alternative gravitational theories, particularly in their cosmological
applications. Her innovative geometrical studies have redefined the
conventional understanding of General Relativity, offering new
perspectives. More recently, she has made significant contributions to
the study of black holes and gravitational waves.
She has
been honoured with the prestigious Latsis Prize of ETH, the Buchalter
Cosmology Prize, the Simons Emmy Noether Award of the Perimeter
Institute, the Gustav-Hertz Prize of the German Physical Society, and
the General Physics Prize of the Swiss Physical Society. She was also a
finalist of the Art of Leadership Award (ALEA) 2023 of ETH and she is a
recipient of ETH’s Diversity Award and the Empowering Women Award in
Switzerland and more.
2023 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction - Full career

The EPS has decided to award the 2023 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction (full career) to Gloria Platero, research professor at the Materials Science Institute of Madrid of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), "in
recognition of her remarkable contributions to the theoretical
understanding of out-of-equilibrium (Floquet) systems and their
impactful application to quantum materials, for her excellent mentorship
of young researchers and for tirelessly fostering female talent in
physics."
Prof. Gloria Platero studied Physics at the Autonomous
University of Madrid (UAM) and received her PhD in Condensed Matter
Physics there in 1984. After working as assistant professor in Madrid,
she did her postdoc at the Max Planck Institute for high magnetic fields
in Grenoble and then joined the Materials Science Institute of Madrid
first as a postdoc, then as staff researcher. She progressed to Director
of the Condensed Matter Theory Department and she was also Honorary
Professor at the UAM. She was involved in several EU networks and was
invited for research stays in different international research centers.
From 2017 till 2021 she was Mercator Fellow at the University of
Regensburg. She is Fellow of the APS (Quantum Information Division) and
Secretary of the C8 Commission (Semiconductors) of the IUPAP. She will
become Chair on January 2025.
Along the years, she has
investigated time periodic driven systems (a topic known as Floquet
Engineering). Her research, in the field of Quantum Nanotechnologies,
focuses on the theory of spin qubits in quantum dot arrays, their
manipulation and the transfer of quantum information.
Recently,
she also investigates the role of the topological edge states in low
dimensional topological insulators for the transfer of quantum
information with high fidelity.
More info:
- EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
- Lavinia Heisenberg: https://www.thphys.uni-heidelberg.de/ and https://www.physik.uni-heidelberg.de/personen/34109
- Gloria Platero: https://www.eps.org/resource/resmgr/distinctions/Brief-Vita-Gloria-Platero.pdf
Tags:
EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
gravitational physics
out-of-equilibrium (Floquet) systems
spin qubits
theoretical cosmology
women in physics
women in science
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday 21 October 2024
|

FLTR: Elisabetta Paladino, Anna Di Ciaccio, Petra Rudolf, Pas Garcia Martinez and Sara Pirrone - image credit: S. Pirrone
Author: Sara Pirrone on behalf of the SIF-CPO
The
2024 edition of the National Congress of the Italian Physics Society
(SIF), which brings together around 800 Italian physicists for a whole
week, was held in Bologna from 9 to 13 September. The Congress, composed
of plenary plus 7 parallel sessions dedicated to different fields of
physics, represents the meeting point of the scientific community, where
Italian researchers, teachers and students find their common
background. During the Congress, Round Tables are also organized on
specific topics, and particularly this year the SIF Equal Opportunities
Committee (CPO) has planned the Round Table entitled: Actions towards Equal Opportunities in European Physical Societies, moderated by Anna Di Ciaccio, member of the SIF CPO.
The invited participants were Pas García Martínez, Chair of the "Women in Physics" group of the Royal Spanish Physical Society, Elisabetta Paladino, invited as representative of "Women for Quantum", Sara Pirrone, Chair of the CPO of the Italian Physical Society and Petra Rudolf, Chair of the Equal Opportunities Committee (EOC) of the European Physical Society (EPS).
Pas Garcia Martinez
presented the activities of the Specialised Group “Women in Physics”,
created in 2002 according to the guidelines of IUPAP (International
Union of Pure and Applied Physics). She presented statistics and figures
on the presence of women and men in physics in Spanish universities, as
well as projects and initiatives to improve the balance. Among them:
the organization of biennial conferences "Women in Physics", where only
women can be speakers; the organization of webinars on different related
topics; a calendar dedicated to women scientists; the application of
the "Women in Physics" program, and of the Equity Plan actions against
sexism and violence.
Elisabetta Paladino,
presented the "Manifesto of Values" written and supported by the
international group W4Q (Women for Quantum), composed of more than 200
women senior professors in the broad field of quantum physics. The W4Q
Manifesto of Values aims to make the quantum scientific community aware
that despite "social policies" (i.e. regional, national, and EU
initiatives) in the field of gender equality, in many cases the change
is only symbolic. The aim is to achieve real change, to question the way
research (quantum) is currently conducted, and to open a dialogue for
change.
Sara Pirrone presented figures and
statistics on the gender balance in academia and research organizations
in Italy and summarised the main actions carried out by the CPO-SIF from
2017 to date, dedicated to concrete support for gender equality. Among
them: the organization of dedicated facilities for childcare offered
during the Annual National Congress; the creation, since 2020, of the
annual "Laura Bassi" award to promote the talent of women in physics;
the realization of the SIF Gender Budget report, analysing data from the
Annual Congress since 2010, showing the presence of women in different
roles (chair, invited speaker, section president).
Petra Rudolf
illustrated the actions of the EOC of EPS, as The Emmy Noether
Distinction for Women in Physics; The Code of Conduct for EPS
conferences; Round tables, seminars, and workshops on career
and gender issues and how to face harassment. She presented also many
ongoing actions, as well as: Cooperation with EPS Divisions &
Groups, monitoring projects for Gender Fairness in Physics, increasing
participation of women in committees, addressing the number of women
nominations for EPS Prizes/Awards, and promoting young women and
minorities. Besides, the Train-the-trainers workshop is in preparation for 2025.
After
the talks, a debate was opened, and many interesting questions and
comments came from the audience on different subjects. From the
discussions, some points were highlighted, among these, for example, the
need to continue to realize activities not only in the field of Equal
Opportunity, but also to extend actions related to the inclusion of
diversity, ethnicity, and, last but not least, the serious matter of
harassment. Besides, the relevance of collaboration among different
organizations was highlighted.
Tags:
congress
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
gender equality
SIF
young physicists
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday 14 June 2024
Updated: Friday 14 June 2024
|

FLTR: Monika Ritsche-Martke, Petra Rudolf and Ilaria Zardo - image credit: Gina Gunaratnam
Petra Rudolf, chair of the EPS Equal Opportunities Committee,
and Gina Gunaratnam, EPS communication coordinator, interviewed Ilaria
Zardo [IZ], from the Department of Physics, University of Basel (CH),
and Monika Ritsch-Marte [MRM], from the of the Institute of Biomedical
Physics, Dept. of Physiology & Medical Physics, Medical University
of Innsbruck (AT). They are laureates of the EPS Emmy Noether
Distinction 2022.
Why did you choose physics?
IZ:
I was interested in Greek, Latin and Philosophy. When I told my parents
I wanted to study physics, it was a big surprise. Especially to my
father who wondered why I had studied all these subjects to "end up"
with sports (in Italian "physics" and "sports" is the same word).
MRM:
I wanted to find a position in relation to Nature. I come from an
academic family, so they encouraged me. But outside, I didn't get
positive reactions. After having attended the Open Days in Innsbruck, I knew
that I wanted to get a master's degree in sciences.
What is the most rewarding aspect of your career and what difficulties did you encounter?
MRM:
It is nice to have recognition from the community but the most
rewarding is when I do active research, when I get results and I
understand things from Nature.
In the 80s', women had to face
difficult times. There were aggressive attitudes. My younger brother
and my husband are also scientists and they were offered positions while
I didn't get one.
IZ: The most rewarding is when I first finish a
project. When I realise that I found something. When I have gone
through all the paths to get where I want to go and I reach it, this is a
rewarding moment. It is also beautiful to see the same way of
thinking/development in people you work with.
Difficulties: We are
trained to be scientists but not to deal with people. You have a strong
contact with your colleagues. You need trust and faith. This is very
challenging.
Recommendations to encourage diversity
IZ:
I am extremely happy to have a very diverse group: different countries,
different backgrounds. I was motivated by a colleague who told me that
you gain much more from someone who is different from you, who will have
another approach to a problem.
MRM: Quotas are important to get
women involved [in research groups] and I don't care about being called
"Quotenfrau" ("quota woman" in German). It shouldn't be the aim but is a
necessary measure to have more women. If they can do the job, they
should be given the chance.
Career and family
MRM:
I married a colleague! So there was competition between us. It is
difficult to get everything you want once you have a family. I consider
it a "fermionic principle ": either you choose the field of research you
are interested or the place where you want to live. You cannot have the
two at the same time. My advice: be determined but flexible. And ask
yourself the following: What is something I cannot live without?
In my case, I changed fields: from theoretical physics, I switched to medical physics.
IZ:
"I am not a hero!" I have three children and my husband is also a
physicist working in industry. I would advise to not pay attention
to judgement. When asked about children, you can answer that your
husband is never asked about them.
More info
Tags:
award
diversity
EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
interview
medical physics
nanoscience
women in physics
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday 8 February 2024
Updated: Friday 9 February 2024
|

EPS calendar of Inspiring Physicists 2024 | images and design: Xavier De Araujo
Author: Anne Pawsey
The 2024 EPS Calendar of Inspiring Physicists has been released.
Featuring EPS Members, Laureates of EPS awards and Nobel Prize Winners
this initiative aims at presenting inspiring female physicists who can act as role
models for the next generation of scientists. Every month, a new
physicist can be discovered in the calendar with a portrait, a short
description of her field of research and a sentence to inspire and
encourage young people to study physics.
The project was led by
Gina Gunaratnam, communication coordinator at the EPS secretariat and
bought to the page by Xavier de Araujo, the EPS graphic designer. The
rationale behind the project is to increase the visibility of women in
physics. Although in recent years women have become more visible in
fields where historically they were a minority, women are still missing
in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). There is
therefore a need to attract more youngsters to these fields. Not only to
work as researchers but also as technical staff, lab assistants, IT
specialists, to name but a few. The panel of professions related to the
sciences is wide and requires all talents, girls as much as boys.
Society
does not always send this message: girls need to be encouraged in their
choice of studying science by everyone at every stage of their
education: families, teachers, media and government all have a role to
play. When girls show interest in sciences, they should not be diverted
from their objectives, but helped and stimulated in every possible way
to facilitate their aspirations.
Our calendar is currently being
distributed to our member societies and associate members throughout
Europe. We hope that with this initiative and the help of enthusiastic
teachers and scientists, it will inspire young pupils in 2024 and
beyond.
The January
Physicist is Dr. Sara Bolognesi, staff researcher in experimental physics and
laureate of the 2021 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction. Read her interview
here.
Stay tuned, more to come!

More info :
Tags:
EPS Awards
EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
outreach
STEM
women in physics
women in science
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday 25 January 2024
Updated: Thursday 25 January 2024
|

The European Physical Society launched the Emmy Noether Distinction
to recognize noteworthy women physicists who have a strong connection to
Europe through their nationality or work.
Emmy Noether, with her
fundamental and revolutionary work in the abstract algebra and on
conservation laws in theoretical physics, is an exceptional historical
figure for all generations - past, present and future - of physicists.
The
laureates of the Emmy Noether Distinction are chosen for their capacity
to inspire the next generation of scientists, and especially encourage
women to pursue a career in physics. Attribution criteria therefore
focus on the candidate’s:
• research achievements
• endeavours to promote gender equality and the empowerment of women in physics
• coordination of projects and management activity
• service to the scientific community and research administration
Nominators are encouraged to address these four points in their proposal.
Commencing
2022, the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction for Women in Physics is to be
awarded once a year, to two distinguished women physicists. Namely,
the Emmy Noether Distinction will be awarded to an early- and mid–career
laureate, as well as to a more advanced candidate, as a Distinction for
her full career.
|
The selection committee, appointed by the EPS
Equal Opportunities Committee, will consider nominations of women
physicists working in Europe for the 2023 Edition of the Emmy Noether Distinction as of the nomination deadline of 31st January 2024.
|
To make a nomination, apply via this site or submit the following documents to the EPS Secretariat:
-
A
cover letter, detailing (in no more than 3 paragraphs) the motivation
for awarding the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction to the nominee;
-
The nominee’s name, institution and email
-
The nominee’s CV
-
The nominator’s name, institution, and email
-
Optional: No more than 3 support letters
Download the distinction charter
Read more about the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction on the EPS website
Tags:
call
distinction
Emmy Noethe
EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
women in physics
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Gina Gunaratnam,
Tuesday 12 September 2023
Updated: Friday 15 September 2023
|

FLTR: Monika Ritsch-Marte, Petra Rudolf and Ilaria zardo - images: Gina Gunaratnam/EPS
Author: Gina Gunaratnam
The award ceremony of the joint meeting of the Swiss
Physical Society (SPS) and the Austrian Physical Society (ÖPG) took place in early September
at the University of Basel. Started with several awards of the SPS, the event continued with the prizes attributed
by the ÖPG and with the distinction of the
European Physical Society (EPS) dedicated to female physicists.
Prof.
Petra Rudolf, chair of the EPS Equal Opportunities Committee and former
president of the Society, handed over the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
2022 to Prof. Monika Ritsch-Marte (full career) and to Prof. Ilaria Zardo (mid-career).
Monika
Ritsch-Marte, from the Institute of Biomedical Physics, Dept. of
Physiology & Medical Physics, the Medical University of Innsbruck,
Austria, was awarded " for exceptional contributions to
optical microscopy and manipulation methods and for the promotion of
women’s careers in physics. "
Ilaria Zardo, researcher at the Department of physics of the University of Basel, Switzerland, was awarded "for
her contributions in the methodology of characterizing nanoscale
materials and the consequent discovery of their new functional
properties. "
The ceremony was followed by an
interview of both EPS laureates by Prof. Rudolf and a group photo with
laureates of all the presented prizes in the beautiful botanical garden
of the Swiss university.
More info

Petra Rudolf presenting the EPS Emmy Noether Distinction to the SPS-ÖPG audience at the University of Basel

Group photo with all laureates of SPS, ÖPG and EPS prizes in the university's botanical garden
Tags:
distinction
Emmy Noether DIstinction
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
medical physics
nanomaterials
ÖPG
prize
SPS
University of Basel
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday 20 March 2023
Updated: Thursday 16 March 2023
|
The
European Physical Society is happy to announce that the EPS Emmy Noether
Distinction 2022 is awarded to Monika RITSCH-MARTE and to Ilaria ZARDO.Congratulations!
2022 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction – Full Career

The EPS awards the 2022 Emmy Noether Distinction for her Full Career to Monika RITSCH-MARTE of
the Institute of Biomedical Physics, Dept. of Physiology & Medical
Physics, Medical University of Innsbruck (Medizinische Universität
Innsbruck) Austria, “for exceptional contributions to optical
microscopy and manipulation methods and for the promotion of women’s
careers in physics .”
Monika RITSCH-MARTE obtained
her PhD in Quantum Optics and, more specifically, on the generation and
application of nonclassical states of light (so-called “squeezed
light”) from the Waikato University in Hamilton, New Zealand, under the
supervision of Dan F. Walls and Crispin Gardiner in 1988. She returned
to Austria to pursue her career in a Post-Doctoral appointment, working
with P. Zoller at the Institute of Theoretical Physics at the University
of Innsbruck. She enjoyed several short and intermediate length working
visits at the University of Colorado in Boulder (USA), at the
Università degli Studi de Milano (Italy), and at the Research Institute
for Theoretical Physics of Helsinki (Finland). After completing her
Habilitation at the University of Innsbruck in 1995, Monika Ritsch-Marte
accepted the Chair of Biomedical Physics at the Medical University in
Innsbruck in 1998, where she founded a Biomedical Optics group.
Monika
Ritsch-Marte has contributed exceptionally to the development and
application of microscopic methods and optical tweezers. Her research
group has pioneered the use of spatial light modulators in the form
of liquid-crystal displays to optical microscopy. Spatial light
modulators allow rapid switching between different microscopy modalities
(bright field, dark field, phase contrast) without the need for
changing any hardware components. She has pioneered and developed the
use of spiral phase contrast [1] using controllable vector beams [2], and, in particular, edge contrast enhancement based on holographic Fourier plane filtering of the microscopic image.
Monika
Ritsch-Marte and her group also actively work in the field of
non-linear microscopy, and have developed a non-scanning (wide-field)
variant of the chemically-selective coherent anti-Stokes Raman
scattering (CARS) technique.
With her group, Monika Ritsch-Marte
currently develops methods of optical manipulation of ever-larger
particles, among which the optical "macro-tweezers" system, a large
volume dual-beam mirror trap, suitable to trap and guide swimming
micro-organisms without inducing any optical damage.
Monika Ritsch-Marte and her colleague Stefan Bernet hold several patents (e.g.
spiral-phase contrast microscopy or a diffractive Moiré lens with
tuneable refraction index). Monika Ritsch-Marte is one of the world’s
leading authorities on the control and use of structured beams for
optical imaging, on the use of holographic techniques, and on the
development of optical tweezers, in particular in the light of their
application to the imaging and manipulation of living matter.
Monika
Ritsch-Marte provided exceptional service to the community. Together
with Claudia Draxl, she chaired a working group of the Austrian Academy
of Sciences dedicated to the promotion of women in physics. Monika
Ritsch-Marte was the first woman president of the Austrian Physical
Society (ÖPG) from 2007 to 2008, and vice president of the ÖPG from 2009
to 2011 [3]. In 2008, on the occasion of the 130th
birthday of Lise Meitner, Monika Ritsch-Marte initiated, on behalf of
the ÖPG, and in partnership with the DPG, the series of “Lise Meitner
Lectures” [4].
This recurring event aims to present outstanding German and Austrian
woman physicists to the broad public, with the aim of inciting young
women to choose a scientific career, and to reduce ignorance about
science and the scientific method. The Lise Meitner Lectures have been
continuously held, every year, at the occasion of the yearly meetings of
the DPG and of the ÖPG. Monika Ritsch-Marte has continuously been a
member of the Lise-Meitner-Lectures project commission.
The Emmy
Noether Distinction selection committee celebrates the remarkable wealth
of Monika Ritsch-Marte’s scientific achievements over a very broad
spectrum of optics and optical methods, applied to a very wide diversity
of topics, including quantum physics, quantum optics, imaging,
holography, instrumentation, and manipulation. Monika Ritsch-Marte’s
contributions to the field of physics (optics) for life sciences are
exceptional. In addition Monika Ritsch-Marte has worked steadfastly and
untiringly for the recognition of women in physics and for the promotion
of physics as a career choice for young women, in an environment where
this commands resolve and continuous commitment.
2022 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction – Mid-career

The EPS awards the 2022 Emmy Noether Distinction for mid-career candidates to Ilaria ZARDO of the Department of Physics, University of Basel, Switzerland, "for
her contributions in the methodology of characterizing nanoscale
materials and the consequent discovery of their new functional
properties."
Ilaria Zardo obtained her
Ph.D. in physics from the Technical University of Munich (Technische
Universität München – TUM) in Germany and University of Rome “La
Sapienza” (Università di Roma - “La Sapienza”) in Italy on the “Growth
and Raman spectroscopy studies of gold-free catalyzed semiconductor
nanowires” in October 2010 with a « summa cum laude » mention. Her
advisors were Prof. Gerhard Abstreiter, Prof. Anna Fontcuberta i Morral,
and Prof. P. Postorino. Ilaria Zardo subsequently continued to work
with Prof. Abstreiter on a post-doctoral appointment at TUM, before
moving to the Netherlands for a second post-doc at the Technical
University of Eindhoven, where she worked with Prof. Erik P.A.M.
Bakkers. Ilaria Zardo became an Assistant Professor of Experimental
Physics at the University of Basel in Switzerland in 2015, and secured
an Associate Professorship in Experimental Physics at the Department of
Physics in Basel in 2020.
Ilaria Zardo’s work has provides key new
insights in the area of semiconductor nanostructures. In particular,
Ilaria Zardo has made very substantial contributions to the
understanding of polytypism, i.e. the possibility of a same material adopting different crystalline structures. This can arise as a result of, e.g.
different growth conditions or methods, or of the material’s reduced
physical dimensions: a material structure unstable in bulk form may be
stable upon synthesis as a thin film, a nanorod or nanowire, or a
nanoparticle. Thus, Ilaria Zardo was among the first to grow silicon in a
hexagonal structure [5],
and was the first to demonstrate, through the design of a novel and
unique experimental set-up, that polytypism enables fundamentally new
functional properties. For example, Gallium Phosphide GaP transforms
into a direct bandgap semiconductor when crystallised in the wurtzite
phase. Key to her scientific success is Ilaria Zardo’s innovative use
of Raman spectroscopy of nanowire systems, and the combination of theory
and experiment to do so. She was the first to derive the optical
selection rules for a range of III-V compounds such as GaAs, InAs and
AlAs. She also predicted and experimentally confirmed which additional
modes should be detected when the wurtzite phase appears instead of the
common zinc blende. Ilaria Zardo introduced her insights into the field
of thermal transport, demonstrating the ability to engineer phonons (i.e.
crystal lattice vibration modes) in polytype nanowires, leading to the
field of nanophononics, and enabling novel applications in thermal
management, electronic devices (phonon circuits), and quantum computing.
Alongside
her scientific research, Prof. Ilaria Zardo has, since her appointment
at the University of Basel, continuously, consistently, and intensively
engaged in many actions designed to stimulate the choice of a scientific
career by young women. Ilaria Zardo recognized very early on that role
modelling has to start at an early age. She engaged in high school
events to promote mathematics, information science, natural science, and
technology topics to girls (e.g. at the Tech Days of the Swiss
Academies of Technical Sciences), and initialised and organised annual
network events for young women on the International Day of Women and
Girls in Science. Ilaria Zardo also works behind the scenes, e.g.
to guarantee female representation in her university and
internationally; she engages, in her personal time, in mentorship of
young women seeking to build an academic career, efforts rewarded by the
awards and appointments obtained by her students.
The Emmy
Noether selection committee is deeply impressed by Ilaria Zardo’s
excellence in all aspects: scientific impact, teaching, project
management and coordination, project evaluation on the national and
international level, support to the community, support and mentoring of
women students from the high school to the university level, her
engagement in stimulating young women to choose scientific careers, and
her continuous dedication to scientific outreach. All the more
remarkable considering her present career stage, Ilaria Zardo’s
achievements set a shining example for all women striving to pursue a
career in physics.
More info:
[1] https://scholar.google.at/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=attixk4AAAAJ&citation_for_view=attixk4AAAAJ:84Dmd_oSKgsC
Tags:
EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
EPS EOC
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
nanoscale materials
optical microscopy
women in physics
women in science
Permalink
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Wednesday 14 December 2022
Updated: Wednesday 14 December 2022
|
Author: Kees van der Beek

Kees van der Beek, chair of the EPS Equal Opportunities Committee, spoke to María Pilar López Sancho (Madrid
Institute for Materials Science – ICMM and Spanish Higher Council for
Scientific Research - CSIC), winner of the Winter 2021 EPS Emmy
Noether Distinction on her career, the effectiveness of advocacy of
gender equality, cultural bias, and the future of action for equality.
Kees van der Beek (KvdB):
My very warmest congratulations with the Winter 2021 Emmy Noether
Distinction, awarded for your many contributions to solid state physics
and to strengthening the position of women in physics! Could you tell us
how you came to choose physics as a career path? Spanish society at the
time was very different from now. What was it like for women to engage
in a scientific career in the late nineteen-sixties, early
nineteen-seventies? Were there many women in physics or other sciences
back then?
María Pilar López Sancho(PLS): At
the time, most schools in Spain were of religious character, and both
primary and secondary schools were separated by gender. Therefore, all
my classmates were girls. At age 14, we had to make the decision of
continuing our studies or not, and, if we did, whether we preferred
humanities or the sciences. In my class, of those who choose the
sciences, we were five girls to choose physics. As for me, this was
because I wished to look beyond pure mathematics and study other areas
of the natural sciences. It is a bit paradoxical that, as a result of
the system of the day, and while we as women were certainly a minority
in the scientific field, we were not few, or a small minority by any
means. In chemistry in particular, there were many women. As for me, the
first time I noticed that as women, we were a minority, was during my
university studies and laboratory work at the university. Those years
also corresponded to the final convulsions of Franco’s regime.
University life was punctuated by intense political activity, and by
external policing of university affairs. Nevertheless, I look back on
those years dearly, because they were filled with comradeship, intensive
learning, and the acquiring of very many formative experiences.
After
university, many of us, including myself, wanted to pursue theoretical
physics, a field in which there were very few professional opportunities
and very few professorial chairs in the late nineteen-seventies and the
early nineteen-eighties. I therefore came to experimental physics,
where I was immediately drawn to surface physics and the interaction of
gases and molecules with metallic surfaces. You have to understand that
the development of new experimental techniques such as Angle-Resolved
Photo-Emission Spectroscopy (ARPES) at the time was absolutely
spectacular. However, Spanish science was still badly funded in the day,
so that many experimentalists such as myself moved to modelling of the
latest spectacular results, and, from there, to theoretical condensed
matter physics. I am nevertheless surrounded by laboratories and have
thus maintained proximity with experimentalists at ICMM, but I think
those links between theoreticians and experimentalists might have been,
and should be stronger.
KvdB: How did you move into the field of low-dimensional materials? Was that a natural evolution given your environment?
PLS:
I had been working on the physical and the electronic properties of
metals and had developed quite a few techniques that I could quite
quickly apply to the cuprate high temperature superconductors discovered
in 1986, and from there, to other highly correlated electronic systems
as well as to carbon nanotubes. In parallel, several colleagues of mine
had already worked on the hypothesis of Dirac-like electron physics such
as surmised for two-dimensional carbon, or graphene, even before this
was isolated. When it was, it was simply naturally to shift our
attention to that system.
KvdB:Among the many
areas of condensed matter topics that you have studied, which appealed
the most to you as a particular challenge that you wanted to take up?
Are there areas that you would have liked to study but didn’t?
PLS:
I think that twistronics and the currently much studied twisted
bilayers and multilayers built of two-dimensional materials are
extremely interesting and very challenging, not in the least through the
necessity of taking very large numbers of atoms into account into any
computational effort made on these systems. Besides that, I am most
interested in the topological properties of electronic systems, and the
relation between topology and disorder, which to me was really quite
unexpected.
KvdB: Apart from a very successful
career in physics, you have built a very rich “second career” in
furthering gender equality and the cause of women physicists. How did
you start? Was there a particular “flashpoint” that made you realise
that you should do this?
PLS: For most of my
career, I took no notice of gender issues and the position of women in
physics. However, in 1999, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
published a report assessing gender segregation within their scientific
faculty. When I read the results, I was astonished! How could gender
bias and gender inequality thrive, or even exist, in such a prestigious
institution? The MIT study was quickly followed by assessments of gender
bias in scientific institutions in Europe and published by the European
Commission. It was then that I, and other colleagues, realised that, at
ICMM and in Spain, we were in a similar position, that there was indeed
inequality in career progress, with not a single woman in the higher
ranks of our institutions. I started to undertake action when I learned,
in 1999, that the American Physical Society had acted upon the matter
by founding their Committee on the Status of Women in Physics (CSWP),
and demanded that the Royal Spanish Physical Society RSEF create a
similar section – this happened in 2001. To build the case, we had
gathered figures on the role and representation of women physicists in
Spain that I presented to the RSEF. It was because of this that I got
noticed, and that I was invited, along with three other RSEF colleagues,
to attend the 2002 IUPAP First International Conference on Women in
Physics in Paris. What an eye-opener that was! It was there that I met
our colleagues who lead the first actions at MIT as well as many others,
from countries all over the world, and that we decided, together, that
physics should be done differently, and that we should do all we could
to attract young women to a physics career. Once involved, I could not
go back. I realized the importance of the issue, and before long had
many responsibilities. These involved a lot of work, for I was not an
expert in gender issues, nor were my collaborators, and we had little
help. So indeed, our work amounted to almost a second research career!
KvdB:
How did you balance your activity with your research? Could you achieve
balance, or did you have to sacrifice some activities? Did you have
reservations or second thoughts at some time?
PLS:
I am a theoretical physicist, and do not head a permanent group.
Therefore, my scientific production depends directly on the number of
hours I personally put in. The thing is that, once I got involved in the
Women and Science Commission (Comisión Mujeres y Ciencia)
of CSIC and in the Association of Women Scientist and Technologists
(AMIT), I was solicited for a much wider range of issues that I
initially foresaw, urgent issues that demanded action. For example,
there were many young women that encountered great difficulties
reconciling maternity – there was, initially, no satisfactory regulation
as to maternity leave – and their scientific career. If nothing were
done, their career would collapse. Even if it was not my original role,
these women had nowhere else to turn. It is my belief that we did a
great deal for science by helping create conditions that allowed those
women to continue. In doing so, I have met an incredible amount of very
diverse and very interesting people from all scientific and social
backgrounds, convinced of the importance of equality for science and
society. This experience was extremely satisfactory to me and has more
than made up for any scientific papers not published in the process.
KvdB:
As delegate president for the Women and Science Commission, how do
you assess the impact that such a commission has, or can have? Indeed,
once the commission makes proposals, the real work is only beginning.
PLS:
The creation of the Women and Science Commission was very important
because it was the first Spanish public office officially publishing
figures on women in physics and women in science, and thus, to make the
“diagnosis”. I would like to highlight the fundamental role of the then
president of CSIC, Rolf Tarrach, a physicist who approved the formation
of the Commission. His support demonstrated the importance of the
attitude of men and authorities to equality. Once the numbers were
established, it became impossible to deny the reality of gender bias.
From there on, we started to recommend gender-neutral language use in
science. To my surprise, this encountered quite a lot of resistance,
only recently have objections faded and have we come to a more
equilibrated use of our language in a scientific environment. Since
2007, we have, in Spain, a law on gender equality, as well as
established protocols on how to handle sexual or gender-based
harassment. Thanks to initiatives such as of the Women and Science
Commission that brought problems to the forefront, things are better
now. Still, it has been and it remains very difficult to progress on
gender issues, since bias is so strongly engrained. It is important to
recognize the work done in this regard by the Women and Science Unit of
the European Commission.
KvdB: Isn’t furthering gender equality an issue of constant vigilance?
PLS:
I would agree. With astonishment, I sometimes see that even when young
colleagues organise a conference, they invite only male speakers,
claiming that they cannot find any women! Fortunately, young women today
are different. They are more vocal, they are more aware that we have
laws now, laws that regulate and protect gender equality. They do not
hesitate to appeal to these.
KvdB: Having worked in the United Kingdom as well as in Spain, and having sat on the Helsinki Group on Women in Science,
you have quite an important European experience. How would you situate
Spain with respect to other European countries, with respect to the
gender equality issue in science? From afar, Spain looks a leader, with
nearly 50 % of women scientists and engineers. Does this mask remaining
inequalities? In other European countries even the numbers are very low…
PLS:
Indeed there is a difference between Mediterranean Europe and Northern
Europe. For example, I remember that during my time at Imperial College
in the late nineteen-seventies there were significantly less women
physicists than in Spain. A striking example is Turkey, where a large
percentage of scientists – and physicists – are women. Many reasons have
been advanced for this. One opposes the protestant- to catholic and
other cultures, and the different social status of scientists in each.
In protestant cultures, teachers’ and professors’ status would have been
relatively higher with respect to the cleric, whereas in the latter
women were perhaps more easily admitted to academic roles. Another
factor, specific to Spain, Portugal, Greece, and Turkey, would the
liberating effect after the fall of national dictatorships in the
nineteen-seventies. The liberation of society empowered women and
stimulated many to pursue the career they wanted, including academia.
Still, even before that time, i.e. in the nineteen-sixties, many
teachers in Spain were women.
A big problem is the propagation of
role models. Even if a large proportion of primary school teachers in
Spain are women, they tend to be more demanding towards boys than
towards girls, according to education experts.
KvdB:
You have had a wonderful career in science as well as in furthering the
cause of women scientists. If you would be solicited for a further role
in either, would you accept? What would you still like to do?
PLS:
At this time, I have resigned from both the Women and Science
Commission of the CSIC and from the Group of Women Physicists (the Grupo Especializado de Mujeres en Física)
of RSEF. I believe times have changed, and that there is a need for new
people to step forward, people with new perspectives and new
perceptions of society. We have been very successful in raising
awareness and in changing the climate in our research organisations.
What has to change now is the realisation that science, and engineering,
is done not only for the benefit of men, but for that of the whole of
society including women. Beyond adapting our institutions, the very
object of a lot of research should take into account the reality of
diversity. A good first step is the implementation of the diversity
issue in projects, such as nowadays requested by the European Union. To
progress though, experts are needed. Even if I truly want to help on all
issues, I do not hold this expertise, and I think younger people should
take the lead.
KvdB: What recommendations or advice would you give young women in science?
PLS:
Young women should be aware that differences do exist. They should also
be aware that micro-bias exists, and that it can have a large effect on
scientific practice and on society if it is not tackled in time. For
example, it appears that the outcome of scientific evaluation depends on
whether a male or a female CV is under consideration. Such bias is
surely unconscious and unintentional, but, nevertheless, very real. To
improve we need objectivity and transparency and everyone’s effort.

FLTR: Jesús Ricote, Pilar Aranda, Luis Viña, Pascuala García-Martínez, María Pilar López Sancho,
Kees van der Beek and José Ángel Martín Gago - image credit : Ángela R. Bonachera, ICMM.
Tags:
CSIS
EPS Emmy Noether Distinction
EPS Equal Opportunities Committee
ICMM
Royal Spanish Physics Society
RSEF
Spain
Permalink
|
|
|
|