This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join EPS
Activities
Blog Home All Blogs

The Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem was declared as an EPS Historic Site

Posted By Administration, Friday 12 May 2023
Updated: Friday 12 May 2023

Author: Nadav Katz


On 19th April 2023, the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel, was declared as an EPS Historic Site by the European Physical Society (EPS). Luc Bergé, EPS president, inaugurated the site in the presence of invited guests.

This is the first EPS Historic Site distinguished in Israel. Prof. Hanoch Gutfreund and Prof. Eliezer Rabinovici, of the Hebrew University, initiated the nomination of the institute.

Guilio Racah (1909-1965) joined the Hebrew University in 1940 when he was forced to leave Italy due to anti-Semitic persecution. Racah brought with him up-to-date knowledge of modern physics from the European scientific community which he acquired by working closely with world leaders such as Enrico Fermi and Eugene Wigner. For twenty-five years after his arrival, Racah led a revolution in the theoretical understanding of atomic spectroscopy and developed advanced group-theory based tools for the analysis of nuclear systems and elementary particles. Racah educated generations of Israeli scientists and is considered one of the fathers of theoretical physics in Israel.

His work put the Hebrew University and the Racah Institute of Physics on the world map of physics.




From left to right: Prof. Tamir Shefer (Rector of the Hebrew University), Dr. Luc Bergé (EPS president),
Profs. Eliezer Rabinovici, Hanoch Gutfreund and Nadav Katz (Hebrew University).

Images: Racah Institute

Tags:  atomic spectroscopy  EPS Historic Site  EPS HS  Guilio Racah  Hebrew University  Israel  Racah Institute  theoretical physics 

Permalink
 

Interview of Adriana Pálffy: We need measures to support a career in physics and having a family

Posted By Administration, Thursday 20 August 2020
Updated: Thursday 13 August 2020

Author: Luc Bergé



Adriana Pálffy is a theoretical physicist working at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany. By understanding light-matter interaction at the borderline between atomic, nuclear and quantum physics, she aims at obtaining quantum control over nuclear transitions. Her first contacts with physics started in her home town Bucharest, Romania, where she did her undergraduate studies. Adriana received her Ph.D. in theoretical physics at the Justus Liebig University in Giessen, Germany in 2006. She later moved to the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics and became a group leader in 2011. Adriana was a Distinguished Visitor Fellow of the Scottish Universities Physics Alliance in 2012 and 2013 at the University of the West of Scotland and the Strathclyde University. In 2019 she was awarded the Hertha Sponer Prize of the German Physical Society and the Röntgen Prize of the Justus Liebig University in Giessen for her research on the mutual control between x-ray photons and atomic nuclei. Just recently, Adriana obtained a Heisenberg Fellowship from the German Science Foundation that will allow her to move to the Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nueremberg in the fall 2020.

Luc Bergé, President-Elect of the EPS and chair of the EPS Equal Opportunities Committee (LB), interviewed Adriana Pálffy (AP).

LB: Why did you choose to study physics?
AP: According to a family joke, when I was three years old, visiting family friends asked me what would my profession be when I grew up. I replied “I’ll be a physicist like my mother”, although my mother is actually an electrical engineer! So you might say that my interest in physics began in the cradle. It was definitely supported by my mother, who was making up nice children’s stories for me about physical phenomena. This interest remained as I grew older, so I ended up indeed studying physics and becoming a physicist, “like my mother”.

LB: Any worry to match your family life and a career in physics?
AP:I have two small children, so far no permanent position, and the academia job market in Germany is very competitive. This does not make things easy. I am trying my best, but obviously I have less time to work long hours than my – mostly male and often childless – colleagues have. However, no matter the consequences, I wouldn’t have liked to miss a family just because of the career. Society should work on avoiding that scientists – male or female – need to make such a choice. It should not be about family OR job. But it takes some effort to offer conditions that enable having both family and a job.

LB: Are you worried about finding a job in physics?
AP: Yes, I worry about finding a job in academia within the geographical area which is also suitable for my family. The famous two-body or many-body problem for physicists and in particular female physicists with a family is notoriously difficult to solve. Generally speaking, I believe that finding a job as a physicist in the industry or other fields should be reasonably easy. Finding a permanent position in Germany in the academic milieu is very difficult, since there are only very few open positions. There were years where only one or no position with my profile (theoretical atomic/nuclear physics and quantum optics) was advertised at all. At the end of the day, you almost have to believe in miracles.

LB: What has been the personally most rewarding experience and also the biggest difficulty encountered so far in your career?
AP: Scientifically, I had many rewarding moments when projects were completed with nice results and good publications. A clear highlight was the year 2019, when I was awarded two prizes, the Hertha Sponer Prize of the German Physical Society, and later on the Röntgen Prize of the Justus Liebig University in Giessen for my research on x-ray quantum optics. I did my PhD in Giessen, and being awarded the Röntgen Prize from my Alma Mater meant very much to me. As for difficult moments, I think I cannot complain much – apart from minor disappointments, only the overall career situation poses a major question mark.

LB: Did you encounter any difficulty in finding funding for PhD or a post-doc position related to the fact that you are a woman?
AP: No, at that level definitely not. And also later in my experience with third-party funding so far I cannot say I felt any disadvantages in being female. What does feel strange is to be the only female candidate at interviews for professorships. This always raises questions in my head. Am I what they call in Germany the “quota” female candidate? Is this for real?

LB: Any suggestion to guarantee a balanced gender representation in physics?
AP: We probably ask for the impossible! Although the situation is much better in this respect in France than in Germany. You might therefore have better answers than me. However, I can throw in some arguments. We need more female students in physics to start with. For this we need a cool and more “female” image for physics in schools and early education. We need more female role models. And we need measures to support doing physics and having a family in the same time. It is with having a family that men and women stop being equal through the very asymmetry implemented by nature. This turning point comes early – with young people usually in their twenties or thirties – and it is decisive for what career paths women decide to pursue.

LB: Any particular advice for a young aspiring researcher?
AP: Choose your goals realistically but strategically and then give everything to reach them!

LB: Do you have any female ‘physicist cult figure’ or ‘role model’?
AP: That is a good question. I don’t think I have a particular role model, although I do admire very much the life and work of Marie Skłodowska Curie. What did help a lot was to see that there are women in physics and natural sciences which have succeeded with career and family. I think this is very important for young women. I would say that we are less bold to choose a path that wasn’t taken so far (and this makes Marie Curie so special). If all your successful colleagues are male, single or with a housewife at home taking care of the kids, then you start wondering whether this is the right place for you. I was very luck to meet early on as a young postdoc a number of successful female scientists that encouraged me to continue. This was not by chance – it was part of a mentoring program of the Robert-Bosch Foundation – and I am very grateful that I was given this opportunity.



Adriana Pálffy

Tags:  atomic physics  Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics  nuclear physics  quantum optics  theoretical physics 

Permalink
 

2019 Winter edition of the Emmy Noether Distinction - Interview with Cristiane Morais Smith

Posted By admin, Monday 27 January 2020
Updated: Monday 27 January 2020

author: Luc Bergé

In late 2019, Cristiane Morais Smith from the Institute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University in the Netherlands, was awarded the Winter 2019 EPS Emmy Noether Distinction.

Luc Bergé [LB], chair of the EPS Equal Opportunities Committee, interviewed her [CMS].

LB: At what point in your education did you consider a career in physics?

CMS: I did my studies in Paraguacu Paulista, a little village in Brazil, where I was born. When I was 13 years old, the Science teacher gave us a problem to solve: Calculate the acceleration of a particle sliding down an inclined plane without friction. This is the celebrated problem of Galileo, the fact that the acceleration does not depend on the mass. The teacher did not expect that any of us would be able to do it, he considered it as a game. I solved the problem, and when he realized that I had done it, he started shouting for joy. He was a very serious and shy person, and we were all astonished by his expression of genuine enthusiasm. I then asked him: if I would like to play this kind of games when I am older, which profession should I have? He answered: Physicist! That was it! I was decided to become a physicist, although I had never seen one before.

 

 

 

FIG. 1: Prof. C. Morais Smith, Utrecht University, Netherlands (copyright: Ivar Pel)

LB: Did you find a resistance to girls succeeding in science?

CMS: The first resistance came from my own family. In Brazil, there is no exam to finish the school, like the Baccalaureate degree, but there is an exam to enter the university. It is extremely difficult: 4 hours of exam per day during 5 days, and usually there are 100 candidates for each available place. The best universities are the public ones, which are free, but you can usually access one of those only if you study in good private schools, which are very expensive. There were no private schools in my little village. I knew that I should go to a neighbouring town named Marilia to study, otherwise I would have no chance to access a really good university, but this was expensive. One year before my entrance exam to the University, my parents decided to send my youngest brother to a private school in this town. He had still 3 years to go before his exam, but I had only one. If they had money for one kid, I should logically get priority because my exam was closer. But my father argued: your brother will be a family head, so he should have priority to enter the university. I contested and finally my parents sent me too. I studied 16 hours a day to catch up all what I should have learned during the previous years and succeeded to go to UNICAMP, one of the best universities in Brazil. Despite this incident, I must say that I come from a family of very strong women: one of my grand-Moms (102 years old by now) was the first woman to work as a public employee in my village, my mom worked and studied all her life, despite her 4 kids… but boys had a preference in case of scarce funds.

LB: Do you believe that physics should positively discriminate in favour of women?

CMS: I did not think so when I was young and naïve. I wanted to get everything on my own, and I would have been offended to get anything based on quotas… but now that I have enough experience, I am very much in favour of positive discrimination. We are all constantly discriminating against women, even if we do not wish or even if we are not aware of it. One has to compensate for that somehow, at least until we reach a higher percentage of female physicists. Very often I am the only female speaker in a conference, and this is not normal. 

LB: Do you have advices to girls that wish to start a career in physics?

CMS: Yes. It is fascinating to do physics and to understand how the world around us works. I cannot imagine a better career and a more interesting job. You will be in contact with young students and will discuss with colleagues from all nationalities. You will travel the world and discover that people think and do things differently in other countries. This is an international profession, you can easily be a physicist in any country in the world. And if you decide to change your life and quit the academic career, you can always find a job in industry because physicists learn how to solve problems in general, and people love to have them in their companies!

FIG. 2: Prof. C. Morais Smith at a PhD ceremony of one of her students in front of a wall of the Academy building
covered with the portrait of female professors at Utrecht University, for a campaign launched during the 100 year Jubilee
of the first woman professor.

Tags:  Emmy Noether Distinction  Equal Opportunities Committee  Theoretical Physics 

Permalink
 
Community Search
Sign In
Login with LinkedIn
OR





EPS Privacy Notice :: Contact us